This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
textbook:nrctextbook:chapter12 [2025-01-22 23:13] Merja Herzig |
textbook:nrctextbook:chapter12 [2025-04-28 11:17] (current) Merja Herzig |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== 12 Liquid scintillation counting ====== | + | ====== 12. Liquid scintillation counting ====== |
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | Liquid scintillation counting is primarily used to measure beta radiation (< | + | Liquid scintillation counting is primarily used to measure |
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ===== 12.1. The principle of liquid scintillation counting ===== | ===== 12.1. The principle of liquid scintillation counting ===== | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| Liquid scintillation counting is based on the fact that the radioactive sample and a scintillator agent is dissolved into the same solvent. Three components thus comprise the measured sample: a radioactive sample, an organic solvent or solvent mixture, and one or more scintillation agents. The scintillation agent molecules, also called phosphors and fluors, entirely surround the decaying nuclide and thus avoids the harm of self-absorption and offers $4\pi$- counting geometry, in which all emitting particles or rays are detectable. | Liquid scintillation counting is based on the fact that the radioactive sample and a scintillator agent is dissolved into the same solvent. Three components thus comprise the measured sample: a radioactive sample, an organic solvent or solvent mixture, and one or more scintillation agents. The scintillation agent molecules, also called phosphors and fluors, entirely surround the decaying nuclide and thus avoids the harm of self-absorption and offers $4\pi$- counting geometry, in which all emitting particles or rays are detectable. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | In the event of the decay of the nucleus the released beta particles collide with the solvent molecules, which are in the majority, and transfer their energy to them. These excited solvent molecules then release energy to other molecules. At some point, the energy is received by the scintillation molecules, which are able to release the excitation energy as light. Using a photomultiplier tube, these light pulses, lasting 3-5 ns, are changed into electrical pulses, their height is measured in an analyzer and registered to the different channels of the multichannel analyzer according to pulse height. The height of the pulse obtained by liquid scintillation counting | + | In the event of the [[textbook: |
| - | is proportional to the original energy of the radiation and as the counters are equipped with a multichannel analyzer, they are suitable for energy spectrometry (Figures XII.1-4). | + | |
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Figure XII.1. Functioning of the scintillation agent. | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | Several commercial scintillation liquid mixtures (scintillation cocktails) for liquid scintillation counting are available, containing both solvents and scintillation agents. Liquid scintillation measurements are generally done in either 20 ml or 6 ml plastic or glass vials, of which polyethylene bottles are the most common. | + | Several commercial scintillation liquid mixtures (scintillation cocktails) for liquid scintillation counting are available, containing both solvents and [[textbook: |
| ### | ### | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{: | + | |
| Figure XII.2. Principle of liquid scintillation counting (http:// | Figure XII.2. Principle of liquid scintillation counting (http:// | ||
| Resources/ | Resources/ | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| Figure XII.3. | Figure XII.3. | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| Figure XII.4. Light pulse detection. | Figure XII.4. Light pulse detection. | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ===== 12.2. Solvents ===== | ===== 12.2. Solvents ===== | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | The solvent component of scintillation cocktail has two functions: it must be able to dissolve the sample and scintillation agent, as well as effectively transfer the energy from radioactive particle or ray to the scintillation agent. The best solvents are the aromatics such as xylene, toluene, benzene, and cumene. Aliphatic solvents, such as 1,4-dioxane and cyclohexane are also used. To improve the dissolution of the sample into the scintillation system, many secondary solvents are also used. The benefits of the newer liquid scintillation solvents, e.g. di-isopropylnaphthalene (DIN) and phenyl–o–xylylethane (PXE), are that they have a lower flammability, | + | The solvent component of [[textbook: |
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ===== 12.3. Scintillation agents ===== | ===== 12.3. Scintillation agents ===== | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | Tens of scintillators are recognized for use in liquid scintillation counting. Common ones are p-oligophenyls, | + | Tens of scintillators are recognized for use in liquid scintillation counting. Common ones are p-oligophenyls, |
| ### | ### | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| Figure XII.5. Primary scintillation agent PPO (1-phenyl-4-phenyloxazole) and secondary | Figure XII.5. Primary scintillation agent PPO (1-phenyl-4-phenyloxazole) and secondary | ||
| scintillation agent POPOP. | scintillation agent POPOP. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ===== 12.4. Liquid scintillation counter ===== | ===== 12.4. Liquid scintillation counter ===== | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | The basic element of the liquid scintillation counter is a photomultiplier tube (Figure XII.6), which transforms the light photons into electrons and amplifies them into measurable electrical pulses. At the front end of the photomultiplier tube that the photons hit is a photocathode typically made from Cs< | + | The basic element of the liquid scintillation counter is a //photomultiplier tube// ([[textbook: |
| - | photomultiplier tube are then amplified by dynodes, of which there are 10-14. Between successive dynodes is a voltage applied. The dynodes are also made of Cs< | + | photomultiplier tube are then amplified by //dynodes//, of which there are 10-14. Between successive dynodes is a voltage applied. The dynodes are also made of Cs< |
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| - | {{ : | + | Figure XII.6. Photomultiplier tube (http:// |
| ### | ### | ||
| - | Liquid scintillation counting is used to detect light pulses with photomultiplier tubes using the coincidence technique (Figure XII.7). The sample is between two photomultiplier tubes, which are situated at an angle of 180º from each other. When the radionuclide decays in the scintillation cocktail, a large amount of light photons are simultaneously (in 10< | + | Liquid scintillation counting is used to detect light pulses with photomultiplier tubes using the coincidence technique (Figure XII.7). The sample is between two photomultiplier tubes, which are situated at an angle of 180º from each other. When the [[textbook: |
| - | to 10< | + | |
| - | greatly reduced. In this way a lower background is achieved, when the electronic noise of the photomultiplier tubes, pulses from chemiluminescence and phosphorescence, | + | |
| ### | ### | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| + | |||
| + | Figure XII.7. | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | High count rates are able to be measured by a liquid scintillation counter, because the light pulse lasts only a very short time (10< | + | High [[textbook: |
| - | times longer than the duration of a single light pulse and 10 times longer than a coincidence portal is open. Therefore, when measuring even such high activity each pulse can be detected individually without disturbance from the next pulse. From the coincidence unit the pulses go into a multichannel analyzer, which counts the pulses and differentiates them to different channels according to their height. The number of photons generated by liquid scintillation process is proportional to the initial energy of the beta particles. Tritium, for example, with a maximum energy of 18 keV, generates an average of 35 photons and < | + | times longer than the duration of a single light pulse and 10 times longer than a coincidence portal is open. Therefore, when measuring even such high activity each pulse can be detected individually without disturbance from the next pulse. From the coincidence unit the pulses go into a [[textbook: |
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| - | {{: | + | Figure XII.8. The individually determined liquid scintillation spectra of < |
| ### | ### | ||
| Line 86: | Line 99: | ||
| Liquid scintillation counters are equipped with an automatic sample changer. The samples are placed in either sample sites of a conveyer or of counter cartridges. One sample at a time is measured in a sealed lightproof counting chamber. The light emissions from the sample are gathered as efficiently as possible to the photocathodes of the photomultiplier tubes, which is why the counting chamber walls are aluminum mirrors or painted with titanium oxide. | Liquid scintillation counters are equipped with an automatic sample changer. The samples are placed in either sample sites of a conveyer or of counter cartridges. One sample at a time is measured in a sealed lightproof counting chamber. The light emissions from the sample are gathered as efficiently as possible to the photocathodes of the photomultiplier tubes, which is why the counting chamber walls are aluminum mirrors or painted with titanium oxide. | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ===== 12.5. Quenching ===== | ===== 12.5. Quenching ===== | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | For determining the activity of radioactive samples, their count rates are often compared to those observed with a standard of known activity. Liquid scintillation counting also uses this approach. This approach, however, requires that both the unknown sample and the standard are measured entirely under the same conditions. In measuring beta radiation by liquid scintillation counting, the measurement conditions are rarely the same, because a varying amount of quenching occurs in the samples. Quenching means that either the beta particle energy is absorbed by the measurement | + | For determining the [[textbook: |
| - | sample (liquid scintillation cocktail) before it causes scintillation agent excitation and further light formation or the light emitted by the scintillation agent is absorbed in the sample, therefore being not registered as electrical pulses in a photomultiplier tube. The most difficult problem in liquid scintillation counting is resolving quenching and its impact. There are three types of quenching, all | + | sample (liquid |
| - | of which result in the detection of reduced count rates. In physical quenching the beta particle range does not extend to the scintillation agent, in chemical quenching the energy transmission efficiency from beta particle to the solvent and the scintillator is lowered, and in color quenching the photons are absorbed in the colored substances in the sample. | + | |
| ### | ### | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | Quenching can be somewhat reduced by adding more scintillator, | + | Quenching can be somewhat reduced by adding more scintillator, |
| - | absorbing materials are, e.g. peroxides, acetone, pyridine, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, | + | |
| ### | ### | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| Figure XII.9 shows the effect of quenching on the observed beta spectra. All four samples on both sides have the same activity, but their quenching varies. The shifting of the spectrum to lower channels is due the reduction in intensity of single light pulses. The decrease in the height of the spectrum, in turn, is due to the growing portion of beta particles remaining completely unrecorded. Therefore, even if the activity of the samples is the same, the obtained count rate varies greatly | Figure XII.9 shows the effect of quenching on the observed beta spectra. All four samples on both sides have the same activity, but their quenching varies. The shifting of the spectrum to lower channels is due the reduction in intensity of single light pulses. The decrease in the height of the spectrum, in turn, is due to the growing portion of beta particles remaining completely unrecorded. Therefore, even if the activity of the samples is the same, the obtained count rate varies greatly | ||
| - | depending on the quenching. Thus, the observed count rates cannot be directly compared to those of the standards to allow direct calculation of the unknown sample activity until quenching is accounted for. This is accomplished by determining counting efficiency individually for each sample, which is the ratio of the observed count rate of the sample to the activity of the sample. Thus when the count rate ($\R$) and the counting efficiency ($\E$) are measured the activity ($\A$) of the sample can be calculated by: | + | depending on the quenching. Thus, the observed count rates cannot be directly compared to those of the standards to allow direct calculation of the unknown sample activity until quenching is accounted for. This is accomplished by determining counting efficiency individually for each sample, which is the ratio of the observed count rate of the sample to the activity of the sample. Thus when the count rate ($\text{R}$) and the counting efficiency ($\text{E}$) are measured the activity ($\text{A}$) of the sample can be calculated by: |
| ### | ### | ||
| Line 109: | Line 120: | ||
| ;;# | ;;# | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| Figure XII.9. | Figure XII.9. | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ===== 12.6. Methods for determining counting efficiency ===== | ===== 12.6. Methods for determining counting efficiency ===== | ||
| - | Since [[# | + | ### |
| + | Since [[# | ||
| + | ### | ||
| $$E(\%) = \frac{R(\text{cpm})}{A(\text{dpm})} \times 100\%$$ | $$E(\%) = \frac{R(\text{cpm})}{A(\text{dpm})} \times 100\%$$ | ||
| Line 122: | Line 135: | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | When the count rates are corrected by the counting efficiency to get activity, they may then be compared with each other. The counting efficiency can be determined by many methods, three of which are described here: the use of an internal standard, the external standard channel ratio method, and the external standard end point method. | + | When the count rates are corrected by the counting efficiency to get activity, they may then be compared with each other. The counting efficiency can be determined by many methods, three of which are described here: the use of an //internal standard//, the //external standard// channel ratio method, and the external standard end point method. |
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ==== 12.6.1.The use of an internal standard ==== | ==== 12.6.1.The use of an internal standard ==== | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | Using the internal standard is the most accurate, but tedious. The sample is measured twice: first as it is and then by adding a known amount of the same nuclide as was in the sample and measuring again. Count rate growth is measured, and by comparing it to the amount of added activity the counting efficiency can be obtained as follows: | + | Using the internal standard is the most accurate, but tedious. The sample is measured twice: first as it is and then by adding a known amount of the same nuclide as was in the sample and measuring again. |
| ### | ### | ||
| Line 141: | Line 154: | ||
| $\text{E}$ | $\text{E}$ | ||
| - | The count rate of the unknown sample is then divided by the counting efficiency to get its activity, $A = \frac{{cpm_1 \times 100}}{{E(\%)}}$. | + | ### |
| + | The count rate of the unknown sample is then divided by the [[textbook: | ||
| + | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ==== 12.6.2. The external standard ratio method ==== | ==== 12.6.2. The external standard ratio method ==== | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | In the external standard ratio standardization method the device uses an external < | + | In the external standard ratio standardization method the device uses an external < |
| - | rays are absorbed into scintillation cocktail causing a spectrum similar to that of a beta particle emitting sample, only at a higher channel range (Figure XII.10). The pulses move towards lower channels as the quenching increases. The samples are measured twice: when measuring the actual sample the < | + | |
| - | channel ranges and the pulse number ratio of these channel ranges is calculated. This external standard ratio (ESR) is proportional to quenching: the more quenched the sample, the more pulses move to the lower channels, in other words, the lower is the external standard ratio. Accordingly, | + | |
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | For the standard curve, which is called the quenching curve, a series of samples are measured (quenching series), all of which have the same activity for a particular nuclide, but the quenching is varied, for example, by adding an increasing amount of CHCl< | + | For the standard curve, which is called the quenching curve, a series of samples are measured (quenching series), all of which have the same [[textbook: |
| counter and device does the calculation automatically. | counter and device does the calculation automatically. | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| Figure XII.10. a) unquenched sample (-----) and quenched (- - -) spectrum; b) spectra caused by external standard: unquenched (-----) and quenched (- - -) spectrum; c) external standard ratio (ESR) calculation principle. | Figure XII.10. a) unquenched sample (-----) and quenched (- - -) spectrum; b) spectra caused by external standard: unquenched (-----) and quenched (- - -) spectrum; c) external standard ratio (ESR) calculation principle. | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| ==== 12.6.3. External standard spectrum endpoint method ==== | ==== 12.6.3. External standard spectrum endpoint method ==== | ||
| Line 167: | Line 180: | ||
| The measure of quenching in the external standard spectrum endpoint method, is as the name implies, the endpoint of spectrum caused by the external standard: the greater the quenching, the lower the channel on which the spectrum ends. Since it is difficult to exactly define the endpoint of the spectrum, the endpoint is determined by the channel under which 99.5% of all of the pulses occur. Just as in the sample and external standard channel ratio methods, the external standard endpoint, SQP-value, is determined for the quenching series as a function of counting efficiency and the obtained quenching curve is used to calculate the activity of unknown samples. | The measure of quenching in the external standard spectrum endpoint method, is as the name implies, the endpoint of spectrum caused by the external standard: the greater the quenching, the lower the channel on which the spectrum ends. Since it is difficult to exactly define the endpoint of the spectrum, the endpoint is determined by the channel under which 99.5% of all of the pulses occur. Just as in the sample and external standard channel ratio methods, the external standard endpoint, SQP-value, is determined for the quenching series as a function of counting efficiency and the obtained quenching curve is used to calculate the activity of unknown samples. | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ===== 12.7. Cherenkov counting with a liquid scintillation counter ===== | ===== 12.7. Cherenkov counting with a liquid scintillation counter ===== | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | When a charged particle passes through the medium at a speed faster than light, it polarizes the medium molecules. When this polarization is released, the medium molecules emit photon radiation of ultraviolet and visible light spectrum range. This phenomenon, which is called Cherenkov radiation, can be used for beta radiation measurement because it is also identifiable by the photomultiplier tube of a liquid scintillation counter. | + | When a charged particle passes through the medium at a speed faster than light, it polarizes the medium molecules. When this polarization is released, the medium molecules emit photon radiation of ultraviolet and visible light spectrum range. This phenomenon, which is called |
| radiation measurement when the beta radiation energy is at least 800 keV. For Example, only 2% of counting effectiveness is achieved in Cherenkov counting with < | radiation measurement when the beta radiation energy is at least 800 keV. For Example, only 2% of counting effectiveness is achieved in Cherenkov counting with < | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| Line 178: | Line 191: | ||
| Cherenkov radiation measurement has some important advantages compared to liquid scintillation counting. First, larger amounts of the solution can be measured since no liquid scintillation solution needs to be added to the counting vial. Second, no costly liquid scintillation waste is generated in Cherenkov counting. | Cherenkov radiation measurement has some important advantages compared to liquid scintillation counting. First, larger amounts of the solution can be measured since no liquid scintillation solution needs to be added to the counting vial. Second, no costly liquid scintillation waste is generated in Cherenkov counting. | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ===== 12.8. Alpha measurement with a liquid scintillation counter ===== | ===== 12.8. Alpha measurement with a liquid scintillation counter ===== | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | The determination of alpha emitters | + | The determination of [[textbook: |
| - | are in immediate contact with the scintillator. Since the energies of alpha particles are high, generally 4-6 MeV, in practice their detection efficiency is nearly 100% and quenching is usually not a problem. In addition, because the liquid scintillation counters have sample changer, its measurement capacity is superior to that of the semiconductor. The disadvantage that liquid scintillation counting has compared to the semiconductor detectors is its significantly worse energy resolution. The best semiconductor detectors will yield a peak width values at half maximum of 10- | + | are in immediate contact with the scintillator. Since the energies of [[textbook: |
| - | 20 keV, while liquid scintillation counters get, at best, only 200 keV. Therefore, alpha energies that are close to each other are not able to be measured separately with a liquid scintillation counter. Another problem in measuring alpha radiation with a liquid scintillation counter h when measuring environmental samples is the fact that the beta radiation forms a high background that interferes with the measurement. Today, however, there are liquid scintillation counters capable of differentiating between the pulses caused by alpha particles from those caused by beta particles. | + | |
| The electric pulse induced by beta particles is considerably shorter, around a few nanoseconds, | The electric pulse induced by beta particles is considerably shorter, around a few nanoseconds, | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| + | Figure XII.12. The alpha- and beta spectra of < | ||
| + | {{anchor: | ||
| ===== 12.9. Sample preparation for liquid scintillation counting ===== | ===== 12.9. Sample preparation for liquid scintillation counting ===== | ||
| ### | ### | ||
| - | In addition to the determination of the counting efficiency there is a second critical task in the liquid scintillation counting: preparation of samples. Whenever possible, a homogeneous measurement sample should be obtained in which the radionuclide is evenly dissolved in the liquid scintillation cocktail. If the sample is an organic solvent, it is usually directly soluble in the liquid scintillation cocktail. This, however, is rarely the case. Usually the samples for measurement are aqueous samples. Water is only partially soluble in organic liquid scintillation solvents, but even the best cocktails can reach as high as 50% water concentration. Water samples can also be measured as gels, in which case the water is evenly distributed in the liquid scintillation cocktail. Many insoluble organic substances must be decomposed before measurement. Dissolution can be done with e.g. perchloric-hydrogen peroxide oxidation or burning the sample and collecting the CO< | + | In addition to the determination of the [[textbook: |
| - | both vials - automatically too (Figure XII.13). Insoluble samples, e.g. fine solids and chromatography masses can be measured as heterogenetic samples by adding them and a liquid scintillation cocktail to a gelling substance, like aluminum stearate, forming a gel in which the precipitate is evenly distributed. Radioactive chromatography or electrophoresis strips can be measured directly by immersing them in a liquid scintillation cocktail containing flask. The sample preparation methods are summarized in the Figure XII.14. | + | |
| ### | ### | ||
email: mst@evalion.cz | tel: +420 224 358 331 | Copyright © 2021 A-CINCH
This project has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2019–2020 under grant agreement No. 945301.