This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
remote_control_experiments:neutron_activation_of_ag [2023-10-03 11:26] Jon Peter Omtvedt |
remote_control_experiments:neutron_activation_of_ag [2023-10-03 12:09] (current) Jon Peter Omtvedt |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
| {{: | {{: | ||
| - | (click on the picture to see a larger version.) You must preset the duration for all the measurement periods (rows in the table) before you perform irradiations. In the beginning you want short intervals to follow the rapid decay, then you switch to longer intervals. We suggest 5x 20 sec followed by 100 sec intervals for the remaining time periods. You should continue measuring until the number of counts fluctuate around the background radiation level in the lab. | + | (click on the picture to see a larger version.) You must preset the duration for all the measurement periods (rows in the table) before you perform irradiations. In the beginning you want short intervals to follow the rapid decay, then you switch to longer intervals. We suggest 5x 20 sec followed by 100 sec intervals for the remaining time periods |
| + | // | ||
| + | For each irradiation you do, you should continue measuring until the number of counts fluctuate around the background radiation level in the lab. Therefore, before you start irradiations you should perform a background measurement. The easiest way to do this is to select e.g. a 300 sec preset duration for the first row in the table and start counting. Once the system finishes with the first measurement and start measuring counts for the second row in the table you can stop and write down the number of counts obtained for the first row. You then divide the counts by the duration to obtain your background count rate in cps (counts per second). | ||
| - | . for the short This will provi with the and measure | + | // |
| - | It is important | + | Make sure you have reset the counting duration after the background measurement to whatever you have selected (probably 20 sec). You can now start performing irradiations. Select a preset time in the irradiation control box (to the left) and push the start irradiation button. In the video feed you will see that the slide with the silver disc disappears - it is sent to the neutron irradiation position on the other side of the concrete wall. There is a sensor inside |
| - | \\ | + | Repeat the procedure above for all your irradiation times. This will conclude the experimental part of your experiment. Remember that if you start an irradiation that somehow did not work out as expected (e.g. wrong preset time) you //must// wait for the induced radioactivity in the silver disk to die out before making a new attempt. Otherwise the measured activity is not representative for the selected irradiation time. |
| - | __How to measure | + | ==== Plotting the Measured Data ==== |
| + | Use a high-quality data plotting and fitting program (e.g. Origin) | ||
| - | //Introduction// | + | Notice that you always shall use the 1/3 of the time into each measurement as the " |
| - | For this part of the exercise, | + | |
| - | // | + | For each irradiation interval plot your data as follows: |
| - | This description assumes you have the Maestro MCA software from ORTEC. If you are using an alternative system, you will have to consult | + | * For each data point calculate |
| - | We want to make successive 20-s measurements followed by 120-s ones to determine | + | * Enter your data in a table (" |
| - | However, with a modern system this tiresome procedure can be automated: In Maestro jargon | + | * Plot the data - does it look OK? If not, find the error. Your measurement points should lie on a line that gradually decay in a smooth way (within statistical uncertainty). |
| - | Since the commands execute very rapidly, you will also be able to spend practically all the time actually counting, something witch is not possible if you are doing everything manually. | + | |
| - | Job-description file: | + | ==== Deconvoluting the Decay Curve ==== |
| - | set_preset_real 20\\ | + | |
| - | loop 7\\ | + | |
| - | clear\\ | + | |
| - | start\\ | + | |
| - | wait\\ | + | |
| - | save m: | + | |
| - | end_loop\\ | + | |
| - | set_preset_real 120\\ | + | Notice: The steps indicated below is not very detailed. We assume that you have a teacher physically present that can help you use whatever software and method he/she has prepared |
| - | loop 7\\ | + | |
| - | clear\\ | + | |
| - | start\\ | + | |
| - | wait\\ | + | |
| - | save m:\spectra\KJM5911_D130_B??? | + | |
| - | end_loop\\ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | set_preset_real 300\\ | + | |
| - | clear\\ | + | |
| - | start\\ | + | |
| - | wait\\ | + | |
| - | save m: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This job-file will perform 8 20-s measurement, | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | // | + | |
| - | The MCA will save spectra containing counts vs. energy. The two interesting gamma-rays from the n-activated silver will overlap and you will not be able to differentiate between them in the NaI spectra. Thus, we will simply use the gross counts and subtract the background as if we had used a simple counter.\\ | + | |
| - | The procedure for measuring each irradiated silver disk is as follows: | + | |
| - | -Measure a background spectrum for as long as possible if you have not already done this. | + | |
| - | -Get the irradiated silver disk and put it as quickly as possible on top of the detector. | + | |
| - | -Start the job-file and note down the time between end-of-irradiation and starting the job-file. | + | |
| - | -Now, sit back and relax! Alternatively (better), if the job-file is saving spectra to a network disk, you can analyze the spectra as they are produced (using another pc which can read the same disk). | + | |
| - | -When the job-file finishes, repeat the measurement | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | From the spectra you should get the following | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Alternative procedure: Select the relevant spectrum region | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | __Analyzing a two-component Decay curve__\\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | Use a high-quality data plotting and fitting program (e.g. Origin) to analyze the data. The fitting '' | + | |
| - | Notice that you always shall use the 1/3 of the time into each measurement as the " | + | |
| - | -For each data point calculate the net count (gross count - background count), the uncertainty of the net count (based on uncertainty of both the gross count and the background count). You might want to use e.g. MS Excel or similar for doing this. | + | |
| - | -Enter your data in a table (" | + | |
| - | -Plot the data - does it look OK? | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| //Manual Method//\\ | //Manual Method//\\ | ||
| Line 153: | Line 108: | ||
| //Automated Method//\\ | //Automated Method//\\ | ||
| - | Use the Origin data-fitting functionality to determine the measured half-life of both components simultaneously. | + | Use your plotting programs |
| - | " | + | |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | __Analyzing | + | ==== Analyzing |
| - | From analyzing the decay curves for the different irradiation times (12, 24, 48, 72, and 144 s) you should have five R< | + | From analyzing the decay curves for the different irradiation times (e.g. 12, 24, 48, 72, and 144 s) you should have a corresponding number of R< |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | \\ | + | |
| + | Notice: Again, the above description is not very detailed. Your teacher will instruct how your are supposed to do this for your particular exercise with the RoboLab system. | ||
| - | ==== Questions for the students ==== | ||
| - | Use the cross-sections from the nuclear chart, the half life and a thermal neutron-flux of 2*103 n/ | ||
| - | Determine what kind of gamma radiation to expect from the silver isotopes produced in the irradiation and their associated relative intensity (e.g. from Berkeley/ | ||
email: mst@evalion.cz | tel: +420 224 358 331 | Copyright © 2021 A-CINCH
This project has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2019–2020 under grant agreement No. 945301.