This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
remote_control_experiments:neutron_activation_of_ag [2023-10-03 10:04] Jon Peter Omtvedt |
remote_control_experiments:neutron_activation_of_ag [2023-10-03 12:09] (current) Jon Peter Omtvedt |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Deconvolution of a decay curve with two components\\ | Deconvolution of a decay curve with two components\\ | ||
| - | === Theory: Neutron Activation of Ag with a Pu/Be n-source === | + | ==== Theory: Neutron Activation of Ag with a Pu/Be n-source |
| //Neutron Source// | //Neutron Source// | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| I.e. for n-activiation of natural silver we will get: < | I.e. for n-activiation of natural silver we will get: < | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | === Experimental | + | ==== Experimental |
| - | //Transport Track and Shielding//\\ | + | //Transport Track//\\ |
| The Pu/Be source is placed inside paraffin blocks (for slowing down the neutrons to thermal energies). A slide with a holder for the silver plate is pushed back and forth along a track that is 3 m long. One end of the track is inside the paraffin blocks with the n-source. The other end of the track is positioned above a NaI(Tl) detector that measures gamma radiation. A one meter thick concrete wall is separating the n-source and the NaI(Tl) detector to protect the detector (and it's operator) from the neutrons. The track goes through this wall at an angle in such a way that there the radiation around the n-source are not able to escape through the wall. | The Pu/Be source is placed inside paraffin blocks (for slowing down the neutrons to thermal energies). A slide with a holder for the silver plate is pushed back and forth along a track that is 3 m long. One end of the track is inside the paraffin blocks with the n-source. The other end of the track is positioned above a NaI(Tl) detector that measures gamma radiation. A one meter thick concrete wall is separating the n-source and the NaI(Tl) detector to protect the detector (and it's operator) from the neutrons. The track goes through this wall at an angle in such a way that there the radiation around the n-source are not able to escape through the wall. | ||
| - | Concrete is not very good at shielding against neutrons, but will reduce gamma radiation fields significantly. We therefore must absorb the neutrons before they enter the concrete shielding wall. The absorption typically will utilize a (n,gamma) reaction. I.e. the neutrons are captured and energetic gamma-radiation is emitted. | + | // |
| + | Concrete is not very good at shielding against neutrons, but will reduce gamma radiation fields significantly. We therefore must absorb the neutrons before they enter the concrete shielding wall. The absorption typically will utilize a (n,gamma) reaction. I.e. the neutrons are captured and energetic gamma-radiation is emitted. | ||
| - | A practical way to put boron around the n-source is to dispersed e.g. boron acid in molten paraffin and cast large shielding blocks. The combination of paraffin and boron will thermalize and capture the neutrons efficiently. These blocks | + | A practical way to put boron around the n-source is to dispersed e.g. boron acid in molten paraffin and cast large shielding blocks. The combination of paraffin and boron will thermalize and capture the neutrons efficiently. These blocks |
| - | {{: | + | |
| + | The advantage of using borate paraffin, is that about 20% of the natural boron is < | ||
| + | |||
| + | The picture below shows the borate | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | The tube closest to the track (left in the picture) is a tube for lowering the n-source into place close to the track. The source can also be positioned lower down and is then used to do n-irradiation of samples that can be inserted into the other tubes in the picture. This is not in use for the this RoboLab exercise. | ||
| + | |||
| + | On the other side of the one meter thick concrete wall, the track exits and ends in a lead shielding tower for the NaI(Tl) detector. This is shown in the picture below. | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| - | will push the plate inside | + | As you can see, there is some extra lead-shielding outside |
| - | Your supervise will operate | + | |
| - | You then run as fast as possible (STRAFAP - STudents Running As Fast As Possible) but carefully | + | |
| - | Perform five irradiations with the following times: 12, 24, 48, 72, 144 s and measure the resulting decay curves of the two silver isotopes. | + | |
| - | It is important that you let the silver decay before you perform the subsequent irradiations, | + | |
| - | \\ | + | {{: |
| - | __How to measure | + | In this picture you can also see the vacuum control valves that is pushing the silver disc back and forth during your experiments. Through the mirror you also get a glimpse |
| - | // | + | ==== Experimental Procedure ==== |
| - | For this part of the exercise, you will use a NaI detector connected to a Multi-Channel Analyzer (MCA) to determine the disintegration rate of the n-activated silver. | + | |
| - | // | + | You should perform at least five irradiations. The following durations |
| - | This description assumes you have the Maestro MCA software from ORTEC. If you are using an alternative system, you will have to consult the manual to figure out how to use it. The procedure should not be very different, though.\\ | + | |
| - | We want to make successive 20-s measurements followed by 120-s ones to determine the half-life curve of the silver isotopes. This can be done manually by successive starting-waiting-stopping-saving-clearing operations.\\ | + | |
| - | However, with a modern system this tiresome procedure can be automated: In Maestro jargon | + | |
| - | Since the commands execute very rapidly, you will also be able to spend practically all the time actually counting, something witch is not possible if you are doing everything manually. | + | |
| - | Job-description file: | + | Your web page to control the RoboLab should look something like this: |
| - | set_preset_real 20\\ | + | |
| - | loop 7\\ | + | |
| - | clear\\ | + | |
| - | start\\ | + | |
| - | wait\\ | + | |
| - | save m: | + | |
| - | end_loop\\ | + | |
| - | set_preset_real 120\\ | + | {{:remote_control_experiments: |
| - | loop 7\\ | + | |
| - | clear\\ | + | |
| - | start\\ | + | |
| - | wait\\ | + | |
| - | save m:\spectra\KJM5911_D130_B???.chn\\ | + | |
| - | end_loop\\ | + | |
| - | set_preset_real 300\\ | + | (click on the picture to see a larger version.) You must preset the duration for all the measurement periods (rows in the table) before you perform irradiations. In the beginning you want short intervals to follow the rapid decay, then you switch to longer intervals. We suggest 5x 20 sec followed by 100 sec intervals for the remaining time periods (this will be the defaults when you start up RoboLab). |
| - | clear\\ | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | wait\\ | + | |
| - | save m: | + | |
| - | This job-file will perform 8 20-s measurement, then 8 120-s measurements and finally | + | // |
| - | \\ | + | For each irradiation you do, you should continue measuring until the number of counts fluctuate around the background radiation level in the lab. Therefore, before you start irradiations you should perform |
| - | //Procedure//\\ | + | //Performing irradiations//\\ |
| - | The MCA will save spectra containing counts vs. energy. The two interesting gamma-rays from the n-activated silver will overlap | + | Make sure you have reset the counting duration after the background measurement to whatever you have selected (probably 20 sec). You can now start performing irradiations. Select a preset time in the irradiation control box (to the left) and push the start irradiation button. In the video feed you will see that the slide with the silver disc disappears - it is sent to the neutron irradiation position on the other side of the concrete wall. There is a sensor inside that keeps track of the actual irradiation time. There is also an irradiation indicator light on the control panel. As soon as you see the slide back on top of the detector |
| - | The procedure for measuring each irradiated silver disk is as follows: | + | |
| - | -Measure a background spectrum for as long as possible if you have not already done this. | + | |
| - | -Get the irradiated silver disk and put it as quickly as possible | + | |
| - | -Start | + | |
| - | -Now, sit back and relax! Alternatively (better), if the job-file is saving spectra to a network disk, you can analyze the spectra as they are produced (using another pc which can read the same disk). | + | |
| - | -When the job-file finishes, repeat | + | |
| - | From the spectra | + | Repeat |
| - | Alternative procedure: Select | + | ==== Plotting |
| + | Use a high-quality data plotting | ||
| - | \\ | ||
| - | \\ | ||
| - | __Analyzing a two-component Decay curve__\\ | ||
| - | \\ | ||
| - | Use a high-quality data plotting and fitting program (e.g. Origin) to analyze the data. The fitting '' | ||
| Notice that you always shall use the 1/3 of the time into each measurement as the " | Notice that you always shall use the 1/3 of the time into each measurement as the " | ||
| - | -For each data point calculate the net count (gross count - background count), the uncertainty of the net count (based on uncertainty of both the gross count and the background count). You might want to use e.g. MS Excel or similar for doing this. | + | |
| - | | + | For each irradiation interval plot your data as follows: |
| - | | + | * For each data point calculate the net count (gross count minus background count), the uncertainty of the net count (based on uncertainty of both the gross count and the background count). |
| - | \\ | + | |
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Deconvoluting the Decay Curve ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Notice: The steps indicated below is not very detailed. We assume that you have a teacher physically present that can help you use whatever software and method he/she has prepared for this exercise. How your teaching institution use the data measured with this RoboLab will vary. They might also have provided a more detailed description than what is provided below. | ||
| //Manual Method//\\ | //Manual Method//\\ | ||
| Line 129: | Line 108: | ||
| //Automated Method//\\ | //Automated Method//\\ | ||
| - | Use the Origin data-fitting functionality to determine the measured half-life of both components simultaneously. | + | Use your plotting programs |
| - | " | + | |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | __Analyzing | + | ==== Analyzing |
| - | From analyzing the decay curves for the different irradiation times (12, 24, 48, 72, and 144 s) you should have five R< | + | From analyzing the decay curves for the different irradiation times (e.g. 12, 24, 48, 72, and 144 s) you should have a corresponding number of R< |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | \\ | + | |
| + | Notice: Again, the above description is not very detailed. Your teacher will instruct how your are supposed to do this for your particular exercise with the RoboLab system. | ||
| - | ==== Questions for the students ==== | ||
| - | Use the cross-sections from the nuclear chart, the half life and a thermal neutron-flux of 2*103 n/ | ||
| - | Determine what kind of gamma radiation to expect from the silver isotopes produced in the irradiation and their associated relative intensity (e.g. from Berkeley/ | ||
email: mst@evalion.cz | tel: +420 224 358 331 | Copyright © 2021 A-CINCH
This project has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2019–2020 under grant agreement No. 945301.